Search for: All records

Bactofilins are rigid, nonpolar bacterial cytoskeletal filaments that link cellular processes to specific curvatures of the cytoplasmic membrane. Although homologs of bactofilins have been identified in archaea and eukaryotes, functional studies have remained confined to bacterial systems. Here, we characterize representatives of two families of archaeal bactofilins from the pleomorphic archaeonHaloferax volcanii, halofilin A (HalA) and halofilin B (HalB). HalA and HalB polymerize in vitro, assembling into straight bundles. HalA polymers are highly dynamic and accumulate at positive membrane curvatures in vivo, whereas HalB forms more static foci that localize in areas of local negative curvatures on the outer cell surface. Gene deletions and live-cell imaging show that halofilins are critical in maintaining morphological integrity during shape transition from disk (sessile) to rod (motile). Morphological defects in ΔhalAresult in accumulation of highly positive curvatures in rods but not in disks. Conversely, disk-shaped cells are exclusively affected byhalBdeletion, resulting in flatter cells. Furthermore, while ΔhalAand ΔhalBcells imprecisely determine the future division plane, defects arise predominantly during the disk-to-rod shape remodeling. The deletion ofhalAin the haloarchaeonHalobacterium salinarum, whose cells are consistently rod-shaped, impacted morphogenesis but not cell division. Increased levels of halofilins enforced drastic deformations in cells devoid of the S-layer, suggesting that HalB polymers are more stable at defective S-layer lattice regions. Our results suggest that halofilins might play a significant mechanical scaffolding role in addition to possibly directing envelope synthesis. 

ABSTRACT Many prokaryotes use swimming motility to move toward favorable conditions and escape adverse surroundings. Regulatory mechanisms governing bacterial flagella-driven motility are well-established; however, little is yet known about the regulation underlying swimming motility propelled by the archaeal cell surface structure, the archaella. Previous research showed that the deletion of the adhesion pilins (PilA1-6), subunits of the type IV pili cell surface structure, renders the model archaeonHaloferax volcaniinon-motile. In this study, we used ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis and a motility assay to identify motile suppressors of the ∆pilA[1-6] strain. Of the eight suppressors identified, six contain missense mutations in archaella biosynthesis genes,arlIandarlJ. In transexpression ofarlIandarlJmutant constructs in the respective multi-deletion strains ∆pilA[1-6]∆arlIand ∆pilA[1-6]∆arlJconfirmed their role in suppressing the ∆pilA[1-6] motility defect. Additionally, three suppressors harbor co-occurring disruptive missense and nonsense mutations incirA, a gene encoding a proposed regulatory protein. A deletion ofcirAresulted in hypermotility, whilecirAexpressionin transin wild-type cells led to decreased motility. Moreover, quantitative real-time PCR analysis revealed that in wild-type cells, higher expression levels ofarlI,arlJ, and the archaellin genearlA1were observed in motile early-log phase rod-shaped cells compared to non-motile mid-log phase disk-shaped cells. Conversely, ∆cirAcells, which form rods during both early- and mid-log phases, exhibited similar expression levels ofarlgenes in both growth phases. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms governing archaeal motility, highlighting the involvement of ArlI, ArlJ, and CirA in pilin-mediated motility regulation.IMPORTANCEArchaea are close relatives of eukaryotes and play crucial ecological roles. Certain behaviors, such as swimming motility, are thought to be important for archaeal environmental adaptation. Archaella, the archaeal motility appendages, are evolutionarily distinct from bacterial flagella, and the regulatory mechanisms driving archaeal motility are largely unknown. Previous research has linked the loss of type IV pili subunits to archaeal motility suppression. This study reveals threeHaloferax volcaniiproteins involved in pilin-mediated motility regulation, offering a deeper understanding of motility regulation in this understudied domain while also paving the way for uncovering novel mechanisms that govern archaeal motility. Understanding archaeal cellular processes will help elucidate the ecological roles of archaea as well as the evolution of these processes across domains. 

Bats are famous for using their hearing to explore their environments, yet fewer people are aware that these flying mammals have both good night and daylight vision. Some bats can even see in color thanks to two light-sensitive proteins at the back of their eyes: S-opsin which detects blue and ultraviolet light and L-opsin which detects green and red light. Many species of bat, however, are missing one of these proteins and cannot distinguish any colors; in other words, they are completely color-blind. Some bat species found in Central and South America have independently lost their ability to see blue-ultraviolet light and have thus also lost their color vision. These bats have diverse diets – ranging from insects to fruits and even blood – and being able to distinguish color may offer an advantage in many of their activities, including hunting or foraging. The vision genes in these bats, therefore, give scientists an opportunity to explore how a seemingly important trait can be lost at the molecular level. Sadier, Davies et al. now report that S-opsin has been lost more than a dozen times during the evolutionary history of these Central and South American bats. The analysis used samples from 55 species, including animals caught from the wild and specimens from museums. As with other proteins, the instructions encoded in the gene sequence for S opsin need to be copied into a molecule of RNA before they can be translated into protein. As expected, S-opsin was lost several times because of changes in the gene sequence that disrupted the formation of the protein. However, at several points in these bats’ evolutionary history, additional changes have taken place that affected the production of the RNA or the protein, without an obvious change to the gene itself. This finding suggests that other studies that rely purely on DNA to understand evolution may underestimate how often traits may be lost. By capturing ‘evolution in action’, these results also provide a more complete picture of the molecular targets of evolution in a diverse set of bats.